Monday, January 11, 2016

Surviving the tempest: The Boat, the Tree and the Reed– Kannadasan's Amaithiyana Nathiyinile

The scene is idyllic. A romantic couple seated on a boat in calm waters rowing away with not a care in the world. Just the image that allows a poet to open his heart with unabashed hyperbole. But Kannadasan has his own methods. For some reason, he makes the hero's words seem more like a warning than an expression of love.


அமைதியான நதியினிலே ஓடும் - ஓடம்
அளவில்லாத வெள்ளம் வந்தால் ஆடும்
காற்றினிலும் மழையினிலும்
கலங்க வைக்கும் இடியினிலும்
கரையினிலே ஒதுங்கி நின்றால் வாழும்

In a quiet stream plies a boat; this boat rocks in the face of a flood. In violent winds, rain and terrifying thunder, the boat would survive if it takes shelter in the banks. 

Not exactly romantic– not even remotely close. We should remember that this is not an amateur poet but the maestro himself who has penned these lines. Who are we to question him? Let us just enjoy where he takes us.

But to better understand the context, we may have to as always take help from the Master of this maestro, Lord Krishna, to fill in the blanks.

In the second chapter of the Gita, Lord Krishna paints a picture of the man of perfection- the Sthitha Pragna. While doing so, He cautions Arjuna about the potential dangers lurking in the spiritual voyage.

इन्द्रियाणां हि चरतां
यन्मनो अनुविधीयते
तदस्य हरति प्रज्ञ्यां
वायुर्नावमिवाम्बसि

A person, whose mind wanders among the sense organs can be blown away like a helpless boat in the face of violent winds.

One way to escape the onslaught of the senses is to seek shelter in the banks- run away from the temptations. It is a temporary measure, but certainly effective in the short term.

विषयाविनिवर्तन्ते निराहारस्य देहिनः
The sense objects turn away from the person who refuses to entertain them.

Running away cannot be a permanent solution. It would defeat the very purpose of living. Hence the boat which seeks shelter in the banks eventually will still have to get back into the water.

Kannadasan brings forth his second metaphor in facing this onslaught.  A powerful coconut tree is seen on the banks– deep rooted, sturdy and seemingly unfazed by the howling wind.  However, even this tree has its limits; a powerful cyclone can uproot and cut the proud tree asunder.

தென்னை இளம் கீற்றினிலே
தாலாட்டும் தென்றல் அது
தென்னை தனை சாய்த்துவிடும்
புயலாக  வரும் பொழுது

Vairaagya or dispassion helps a person stand up to temptation with courage and conviction; however, desire is so powerful that the strongest amongst us can still be overwhelmed by it. In fact,  Lord Krishna acknowledges the difficulty of the task by stating निग्रहः किं करिष्यति What can restrain do?

If this is the fate of the mighty, what are we to do? Should we even try to put up a fight? If so, how?

Comes the third metaphor of Kannadasan:

ஆற்றங்கரை மீதினிலே
ஆடி நிற்கும் நாணலது
காற்றடித்தால் சாய்வதில்லை
கனிந்த மனம் வீழ்வதில்லை

On the banks of the river stands the dancing reed. It does not collapse when the wind blows and the mature mind does not fall.

Isn't this also an echo of the famous statement in the Holy Bible?– Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth (Mathew 5:5)

Hence, bow down, surrender to the Lord Almighty. Seek refuge in Him.

Lord Krishna exhorts Arjuna not once, but twice, – almost at the midpoint of the Gita (Chapter IX, verse 34) and towards the end seemingly to make sure that he does not forget (Chapter XVIII, verse 65)

मन्मना भव मद्भक्तः
मद्याजी मां नमस्कुरु
Surrender your mind to Me, become My devotee, worship Me, offer your obeisance to Me.

What then happens to such a devotee?  We have an iron-clad guarantee from Lord Krishna Himself:

कौन्तेय प्रतिजानीहि नमे भक्तः प्रनष्यति
O son of Kunti, know this with certainty, My devotee never perishes.




Friday, January 1, 2016

Kannadasan, Barry Schwartz and Lord Krishna: The Tyranny of Choice



More than 8 million people have viewed this talk. It has made us pause, reflect and reconsider our values. It has the potential to explain the depression and despair faced by today's society in the face of prosperity unmatched in history; it can provide a rational reason for the need for moral values; most importantly it can even explain the success of arranged marriages. It is the famed TED talk by Barry Schwartz on The Paradox of Choice. 

According to Schwartz, we as a society are conditioned to accept that "More choice means more freedom; more freedom means more welfare." However, he argues that this dogma is false. More choice actually leads to regret and despair and an inability to enjoy what we have.

Choice forces us to choose-to make a decision. By choosing one, we run the risk of missing out on the other. If it is a question of picking a box of cereal in a grocery store aisle, well, no big deal. However, if it is a question of deciding between the lawyer on the right and the stockbroker on the left to be your life's partner– the decision making process can be downright cruel. 

One real possibility of a dilemma is to end up being paralyzed- like the proverbial Buridan's ass. According to the French philosopher Buridan, if an ass is placed in the middle with a stack of hay on one side and a pail of water on its other side, both at the same distance from it, the ass would starve to death as it would not be able to make a decision on which one of them to choose. The choice here paralyzes it. While this is a hypothetical situation, versions of this probably occurs not infrequently as when a person freezes in the middle of a railway track, not being able to decide whether to go forward or backward, in the face of an oncoming train.

Schwartz explains the cruelty of making a choice: What if I miss out on the perfect choice? What if my choice does not meet my expectations? What if I end up regretting my choice? Who else but me to be blamed for this choice? This is nothing less than, as Schwartz labels, the tyranny of choice

More than 30 years before Barry Schwartz took the stage in his khaki shorts and T shirt at the TED podium, Kannadasan explained this tyranny of choice in one of his songs: Irandu Manam Vendum இரண்டு மனம் வேண்டும் 

 


இரண்டு மனம் வேண்டும் 
இறைவனிடம் கேட்டேன் 
நினைத்து வாட ஒன்று 
மறந்து வாழ ஒன்று 

இரவும் பகலும் இரண்டானால் 
இன்பம் தும்பம் இரண்டானால் 
உறவும் பிரிவும் இரண்டானால் 
உள்ளம் ஒன்று போதாதே 

Two minds is what I need
I asked of God indeed
One to pine, wallow and wither
The other to forget and live thither

If days and nights are an either or 
A similar pair if pleasure and pain are
If passion and separation are not one but two 
A single mind is one short too

Life is a series of choices: whether we like it or not, we are forced to choose. It has to be or not to be as in the immortal words of Hamlet. One can either have the cake or eat it; can't do it both ways. Having to choose is not necessarily a blessing; it can veritably be a curse. 

In the poem The Road Not takenRobert Frost came upon the two roads that "...diverged in a yellow wood", and chose the one that was less travelled by. However he felt "Sorry that I could not travel both" and therefore had to title the poem more so for the road that he had missed out on. In his poem he seems to indicate that even as he chose the road less travelled by, he was hoping to try the other one later and so had "kept the first for another day." 

Frost made his choice. But what if we are unable to choose? The very choice then becomes a tyranny as Schwartz says, and punishes us. 

Kannadasan writes

கண்களின் தண்டனை காட்சி வழி 
காட்சியின் தண்டனை காதல் வழி 
காதலின் தண்டனை கடவுள் வழி

The punishment of the eyes is through sight
The punishment for sight is through passion
The punishment for passion is through God

This God does seem to have a warped sense of humor. He gives us options but denies us the possibility of enjoying both. 

Well, why don't we let God Himself do our choosing? That seems like an easy enough proposition. We can blame the outcome on Him then, right?

Arjuna, in the battlefield of Kurukshetra, had to choose between the better of two evils- To kill his grand father, teacher, cousins and uncles in a blood bath of a civil war or desert his brothers subjecting them to sure slaughter and allow injustice to prevail. Unable to come up with the right answer, he surrenders to Lord Krishna, who is acting as his charioteer, and says

कार्पण्य दोषो पहतः स्वभावः 
पृच्छामि त्वां धर्म संमूढ चेताः 
यच्छ्रेयः स्यान्निश्चितं ब्रूहि तन्मे 
शिष्यस्तेऽहं शाधि मां त्वां प्रपन्नम् 

My nature is overwhelmed by a sense of pity; I know not as to what is right. Take me as your disciple and please tell me decisively as to what is ultimately good (shreyas)  for me to do.   

It cannot be a coincidence that the divine sage Veda Vyasa places the word Shreyas in Arjuna's mouth. It rather is quite possibly a nod to the great Katha Upanishad which very likely inspired the Maharishi to compose the Bhagavad Gita. In the Katha Upanishad, again Lord Yama instructs his disciple, Nachiketas, about life being a series of choices- the path of pleasure (Preyas) versus the path of Ultimate good (Shreyas)

Lord Krishna delivers the Bhagavad Gita to Arjuna, pointing out the highest potential that a human being can realize, elaborately painting the picture of perfection and also meticulously detailing the path to reach there. After nearly 700 verses of instruction, the Lord, who is not above mischief, stops short of telling Arjuna what to do. He leaves Arjuna with the burden of choice.  Lord Krishna concludes with his famous advice

यथा इच्छसि तथा कुरु: Do as you please

No doubt Kannadasan ends his song with this rhetorical question

கடவுளை தண்டிக்க என்ன வழி 
How do I punish this God?